Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Explicit Mentions
Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Mar 2026 01:07:43 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN-aAr-3xeYaVZSbzOKKXgaFywu1HH5oaKXdQND2+=JYA0i4VQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 3:31 PM Marvin W. via Standards <[email protected]> wrote: > There was already discussions on that matter during Summit and I made > the point that I believe we have two entirely separate issues here that > IMO should also be treated entirely independent (potentially using two > XEPs): > (a) Markup to the body, that has the purpose to indicate that a part of > the body is referring to a user or a group of users > (b) Some indication that the message should have some sort of priority > to a user or a group of users I just want to briefly mention that I agree with Marvin. Those should be two different things. The markup part should be made *compatible with* 0394. I don’t think it should it be in 0394 and I think people should be able to implement one without the other. But those two things should be aware of each other and for example prevent overlapping sections and stuff. And then <attention/> but not actually <attention/> should be it's own element that can but doesn’t have to be generated by the MUC service. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]