Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Explicit Mentions
Kevin Smith via Standards <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:48:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 24 Mar 2026, at 17:07, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 3:31 PM Marvin W. via Standards > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There was already discussions on that matter during Summit and I made >> the point that I believe we have two entirely separate issues here that >> IMO should also be treated entirely independent (potentially using two >> XEPs): >> (a) Markup to the body, that has the purpose to indicate that a part of >> the body is referring to a user or a group of users >> (b) Some indication that the message should have some sort of priority >> to a user or a group of users > > I just want to briefly mention that I agree with Marvin. Those should > be two different things. The markup part should be made *compatible > with* 0394. I don’t think it should it be in 0394 and I think people > should be able to implement one without the other. But those two > things should be aware of each other and for example prevent > overlapping sections and stuff. I think it makes sense to update References(372) to say that when used with 394 it shouldn’t have partially overlapping spans and references. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]