Re: Extending XEP-0313 with trimming support
Goffi <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:18:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8662029.T7Z3S40VBb@tazar3> |
Hi Matthew, Le mardi 31 mars 2026, 13:20:57 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Matthew Wild a écrit : > On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 at 12:09, Marvin W. via Standards > <[email protected]> wrote: > [SNIP] > I agree we are far from "everything in one specification", but I think > there is a balance to strike between having every little feature in > individual XEPs, and having everything related to, say, archive > management, in one place. MUC is suffering from the effects of the > "small bolted on XEPs" approach right now, and it makes it a pain for > implementers to figure out what's what. > > [SNIP] Thanks for the feature proposal, it would be indeed a nice addition. I do agree with Marvin and I think that it should go to a new XEP. Please note that we have keywords that can now be specified in XEPs, you can add a `MAM` one, and it will be easy to figure out which XEPs are related to MAM. It's even better to have it in separated XEPs, as we then have metrics such as the number of implementer, and we can easily find existing implementations to test a new one. Best, Goffi _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEsNZvWyEnjW9SVudbKqmcu6xuKwwFAmnLybIACgkQKqmcu6xu KwwrlAf/RuO5hK0AyNpTX/oR4XlULaL4+h7Fs/EqsizWA5ceq+jPSYDmEW23QTFp SfMKdNn73da0QS3mXIwGd/Iz2FDRZSctlsxDPD6Dc5XiUm+cJcb0jDohE8hXv4On +7JJlJ4lbbQHkIbuHgi9CFUJK3IBml71DCqEDe4c1RRb4dPQXbukzemlYLPNhb88 Vg1j2aUt9Innz5bvjT+/ZblKCQRwXL4EfJpfT8VrDQG2BPeFnTW2mhPa5mY17G7z JH48YttauxXZHMDxodxqhTWv1pcMhznxXrrgUU3lqWeYlqgpNRfVgKhaVn55C34d gxt7WLeehSqykLjflwfQcFx1mAyK7w== =S91Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----