Re: Unmoderation/soft moderation
Philipp Hörist <[email protected]> Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:06:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Please also consider to expose the undo timeframe in disco. Otherwise i see no big problem, in Gajim the implementation is already that moderation is just a flag on the message. The flag tells the GUI how to draw the message. On server side I would expect you could do the same. I would assume a tombstone would only be set of the message is out of the undo timeframe. I would expect that a server can announce with the undo timeframe, if moderation is soft. Regard Philipp On Wed, Apr 1, 2026, at 14:42, Matthew Wild wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 at 13:24, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> I sort of get your last use case with regards to reverting automated >> moderation. I’m terrified of all the extra UI I have to built around >> this. This basically means I have to build a moderation control center >> into my app. I get that for a full fledged discord replacement / large >> community chat platform we will need something like that. But if this >> is our goal then there are so many other things that need to be >> implemented first. > > I understand your concerns, but rest assured I'm aiming for something > that doesn't require that level of UI (but doesn't forbid it either - > as someone involved as owner/admin of many public channels, I'd be > happy for a dedicated "moderation panel" client I could use,and I did > start work on such a thing a few years ago). > > Protocol and implementation aside, showing "Undo moderation" on a > moderated message seems like a natural thing that should exist, > regardless of anything else. The difficulty is that in some cases > permanent moderation is desired, such as when removing illegal > content. I don't think the protocol for this should be too hard for > the client, and the UI is just a menu item (which would replace the > 'Moderate' menu item, if that's how it's implemented). > > If undo functionality exists, the automation is entirely server side, > and shouldn't require anything extra on the clients. > > Regards, > Matthew > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]