Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Explicit Mentions
Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Apr 2026 08:56:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
><reference xmlns='urn:xmpp:reference:0' > type='urn:xmpp:reference:mention:0' > kind='urn:xmpp:reference:mention:0#hats' > uri='https://example.com/schema/hats/cool-people' > begin='5' end='10 /> Why would there be both type and kind? These seem redundant. A "mention" of a group/hat is a fundamentally different thing than a mention, belongs in its own XEP, and certainly deserves it's own type or possibly own syntax. >Because room mentions don't even have a target URI By room mentions you mean attention XEP? _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEWeaCw+rzmiEMpzU00RwpEc5RnN4FAmnNJAEACgkQ0RwpEc5R nN4KaxAAqx9SIb0fsivv0Vi4yEJWW9Y8ff65/EAJqk45Pbp2weT7hAYrhAL2RZd2 NU2hH2pfzjT8FMzMjIB32NvFerECqqUDqJZ6F0Z2TmVj4ICu96g3gdzebRmivtW4 ND6gxuVXB/yTeq7q0ByQ/KpomuN7GTcAwQ2s7ADBQbgdWwCt9BDE/HXHnK2ECDhC Q/Vk1rDySJfRur4V0zCccysR8IFDOZ8AdORhPIOfkz8cpj882cQyAwfu9DnLKHKQ oUz258dBp84L3htKD2h2/w2EWZ9o0sBbC+QKwSCZRy60g5WQ55LewGSTZKkbqn0U 1lx1YdRiifw1xMpkyd5YNWQnsKxs8z72KGHLACdh0Ppo4eCp/y2JzUQNwjOqpLCm anl7fFQtOaQtK9DxVtvT5NOT/MLLl0n88n54Vrz/D2YRI9JOgzY52JAk89baGFle U+EWvETL4jCZohWcutPeChVG2qfileX8r5qmIqRUzzn7ekffY3j9Qr+VYDw9ci37 18+0s5npGUTL1WJ6M/cz/1xPQJDdU0tvIMLOy9grBqoy9113yWyD9EBXOJhTrz0E Cy8MH7k1qcYGbdQKUgSNVhWVmyPSbr109+mJp2f0/XtMP3XE7u5HkzGHkg1N3C6C +YqJCjJWyK3B25KOm4u1Bbz7jFgcAC2GHFsbrNkSUJUEybbSTrw= =UTB2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----