Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Explicit Mentions

Thilo Molitor <[email protected]> Wed, 01 Apr 2026 23:27:58 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig
Message-ID <5086327.7vB82GdCi9@laptop>
> These all seem like the same case. A room "mention" notifies the user. A
> message containing a mention notifies the user. An urgent message notifies
> the user.

Not exactly: on iOS for example, you can turn on something called "focus 
mode", which will mute/hide all notifications. Apps can break through focus 
mode for individual notifications if needed.
For me, XEP-0224 is the exact right XEP to let the sender break through focus 
mode. Using it for mentions instead would mean I'd have to reinvent XEP-0224 
for the focus mode usecase. I'd rather like a new XEP for the various types of 
mentions rather than having to reinvent XEP-0224 to be able to implement the 
focus mode usecase.

> I'm not sure I think the second case is the thing to do, but it would work
> fine?
Imho it is. TLDR; I'd like there to be a new XEP standardizing exactly this:

>Another use-case is for the MUC service to use when a message contains
>a mention. When forwarding the stanza to a user that's been mentioned,
>it attaches the element.


-tmolitor

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEN0CchbhrMgfxs4ncSg9KP3bcW1sFAmnNjd4ACgkQSg9KP3bc
W1tx2Af/XCkw6cOWhbN7ZNtFEukGDcPJVyLZllrjPZWPje7nK0USt8mPew/wcsFN
LZ1HqO4P2yWMtaML1LLswn6Z5/m53yVhUFbA1AmPWd5+fN2YnbuzIqdIod3Yuj1r
Q1FB9sS0uhHHmlypo6+dnWLDGOXaCD4Fh08+Ip+Qme2QGoCyKSeC+pwrTJfJTpvD
wkzSn+yNSWY+9Z3l82YLezlYYIYBpS+QM7vwrhcWCe99AxYl77mOiIGQvsNnc/JM
TBkX8h/GNEW1KNzNWGI4vOpDqxaz/VI/MsUUJOUEpm92AUWbY1Lpu2mGSp75GzjT
IzbUZODPVzTtcvL8/Xb5IUEuOAfPhQ==
=msX/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----