Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Explicit Mentions
Thilo Molitor <[email protected]> Wed, 01 Apr 2026 23:27:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5086327.7vB82GdCi9@laptop> |
> These all seem like the same case. A room "mention" notifies the user. A > message containing a mention notifies the user. An urgent message notifies > the user. Not exactly: on iOS for example, you can turn on something called "focus mode", which will mute/hide all notifications. Apps can break through focus mode for individual notifications if needed. For me, XEP-0224 is the exact right XEP to let the sender break through focus mode. Using it for mentions instead would mean I'd have to reinvent XEP-0224 for the focus mode usecase. I'd rather like a new XEP for the various types of mentions rather than having to reinvent XEP-0224 to be able to implement the focus mode usecase. > I'm not sure I think the second case is the thing to do, but it would work > fine? Imho it is. TLDR; I'd like there to be a new XEP standardizing exactly this: >Another use-case is for the MUC service to use when a message contains >a mention. When forwarding the stanza to a user that's been mentioned, >it attaches the element. -tmolitor _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEN0CchbhrMgfxs4ncSg9KP3bcW1sFAmnNjd4ACgkQSg9KP3bc W1tx2Af/XCkw6cOWhbN7ZNtFEukGDcPJVyLZllrjPZWPje7nK0USt8mPew/wcsFN LZ1HqO4P2yWMtaML1LLswn6Z5/m53yVhUFbA1AmPWd5+fN2YnbuzIqdIod3Yuj1r Q1FB9sS0uhHHmlypo6+dnWLDGOXaCD4Fh08+Ip+Qme2QGoCyKSeC+pwrTJfJTpvD wkzSn+yNSWY+9Z3l82YLezlYYIYBpS+QM7vwrhcWCe99AxYl77mOiIGQvsNnc/JM TBkX8h/GNEW1KNzNWGI4vOpDqxaz/VI/MsUUJOUEpm92AUWbY1Lpu2mGSp75GzjT IzbUZODPVzTtcvL8/Xb5IUEuOAfPhQ== =msX/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----