Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Occupant Mute Synchronization
Goffi <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:45:27 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3410927.44csPzL39Z@tazar3> |
Le mardi 7 avril 2026, 17:08:42 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : > >My main concern with storing a list of <mute> in bookmarks2 is the risk of > >race condition. > > If they mute two different users in two different apps at exactly the same > moment? Is this realistic with human users? - user changes device (or has several client on same device), and one notification arrives late for some reason. - a client is offline, takes time to process MAM and so pubsub notifications, and the user mute an entity before it's done. But I agree that the risk is very low. > > >Also, what if user is in a very huge room and mute dozen of > >participants? > > Then you have a few dozen ids in a list. Is this a problem? Probably not with realistic numbers. I'm just raising a potential issue that may never happen. However, if other extensions are used and added to the room item, we may reach pubsub item size limit at some point. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEsNZvWyEnjW9SVudbKqmcu6xuKwwFAmnVJpcACgkQKqmcu6xu KwzbdAgAzIJVdl6zmooh/zRiYsPcLbX4LMeETn3bqKBCLX2E8VDLFky4KhgZ197R 8V/uAAfgFPmDHFAP2RoZTiLG74BaDQEqZLL5d6ZfxnfSzsKBoRQFoEOYPGGPUk0O y2sa8ClpQuoUjzCisFCdwkaXC2XJ4keWtCHG8ujZOTbD9mehD7X5l8/zx7ppTo6c 1RA3WHlbWJQA4nbyKOFGm92nvZc9g7gc3PcOyqoq3NAUzmOGBQdRTiAAEvb7f5mn fU8sJ/hJ1GaejoqRkgIMp7V87GPhQ0+OBasIYY5JG//kPBDqZ+UBtSxKRV+Nc5gv WZe3c5bHe/uCxBYB/7AqFh+uU4NPFA== =ts/a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----