Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Emoji Markup

techmetx11 via Standards <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Apr 2026 15:51:39 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I was definitely thinking of Emoji Markup being used in Reactions too, 
while I was making it. But I felt like it would be extending the scope 
of the XEP.

Though, I would definitely like to see it be used for reactions (and 
status messages, anything with rich text!)

On 4/24/26 3:43 PM, Nicolas Cedilnik wrote:
> Hi,
>> This seems backwards to me. SFS is just a shallow clone of SIMS but 
>> with less namespace reuse after all. Why would we lend legitimacy to 
>> something like that?
>
> I don't want to take part in which one is the best one. What I can say 
> as someone who tries to develop stuff that has a nice UX on all 
> maintained clients is yes, please, pick one and deprecate the other. 
> It is going to feel nice when I push that -500 lines commit.
>
> About the emoji markup XEP, I am glad to see it submitted, thanks ♥. 
> Besides the namespace issue Daniel mentioned, I wonder if the XEP 
> should cover how to use these for 0444 reactions too? Maybe it's fine 
> to keep that for another XEP, later, I am not sure.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- nicoco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]