Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Emoji Markup
techmetx11 via Standards <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Apr 2026 15:51:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I was definitely thinking of Emoji Markup being used in Reactions too, while I was making it. But I felt like it would be extending the scope of the XEP. Though, I would definitely like to see it be used for reactions (and status messages, anything with rich text!) On 4/24/26 3:43 PM, Nicolas Cedilnik wrote: > Hi, >> This seems backwards to me. SFS is just a shallow clone of SIMS but >> with less namespace reuse after all. Why would we lend legitimacy to >> something like that? > > I don't want to take part in which one is the best one. What I can say > as someone who tries to develop stuff that has a nice UX on all > maintained clients is yes, please, pick one and deprecate the other. > It is going to feel nice when I push that -500 lines commit. > > About the emoji markup XEP, I am glad to see it submitted, thanks ♥. > Besides the namespace issue Daniel mentioned, I wonder if the XEP > should cover how to use these for 0444 reactions too? Maybe it's fine > to keep that for another XEP, later, I am not sure. > > Cheers, > > -- nicoco > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]