Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Emoji Markup

Somebody signing messages as Thilo Molitor wrote:
>> This seems backwards to me. SFS is just a shallow clone of SIMS but with
>> less namespace reuse after all. Why would we lend legitimacy to something
>> like that?
>Are you sure you are talking about the same XEP here?
>XEP-0447 says in its introduction:
>
>Especially using the file metadata element seems like a better namespace reuse
>to me, no?

This element was invented for SFS and is my main objection to the XEP. Many 
equivalent elements exist in other XEP and RFC no need for yet another.

>It also is generic and can be used for all types of file, not just for
>media.

So can SIMS. The M in SIMS may stand for "media" but this is as in "medir 
type" aka all files.
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]