Re: SIMS and SFS, was: Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Emoji Markup

>> No one has to implement Jingle File Transfer
>
>XEP-0385 says "a client supporting this XEP MUST implement Jingle File
>Transfer (XEP-0234)". I'm not sure how to not read that as a MUST. 

Right but we're not talking about supporting that XEP, but rather a totally 
different XEP (sims) which uses part of the same vocabulary.

>It also shows again why having the metadata
>element in its own XEP is a good idea

I'm not picky how we break up the XEPs per se, though some have an idea that 
a namespace definition should be tied to a single XEP.

-- 
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]