Re: QUIC(ker)
Dave Cridland <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:57:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKHUCzyYUfJ0GZm7naf8T_cvZPPHYmazcXjXaTorSkU7XzRsQw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 at 19:35, Travis Burtrum <[email protected]> wrote: > Multiple accounts on the same server is common, eg for people with more > than one phone number from jmp.chat > > I'm sure it happens, but I imagine it happens considerably less than a single account talking to multiple people. > You need protocol to have bare JID bound to the quic connection anyway, so > we can have both. Though the only thing spec'd and implemented now is each > stream is independent which doesn't need protocol. > As noted elsewhere, I've implemented a PoC for multi-stream QUIC, and a PR against XEP-0467 for it. Would appreciate your comments/feedback. I would note that I'm actually running discovery via SRV records; I'm not keen on the idea of using an HTTP call to get the connection details, and haven't revisited SVCB for XMPP yet - though I probably should. I've deliberately not included this SRV discovery in the spec, I think that's entirely orthogonal. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]