Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: New MUC

Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 09:54:35 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

>> >the IPR policy, and a bad actor could then take them away and (for
>> example)
>> >charge access.
>>
>> "a bad actor" as in the author? Could decide to ... not submit? I guess
>> they
>> could, but if the final draft ends up totally different than the initial
>> they could do that anyway if they have some reason to.
>>
>
>Irrespective of the example, you do, surely, accept that work ought to
>happen within the IPR?

I agree that finished specs as submitted and accepted by the XSF should be 
covered by the IPR.

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)