Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: New MUC

On Mon, 11 May 2026 at 16:13, Marvin W. <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you want to say "hey people, I'm trying to come up with something, but
> I don't know how and what exactly, let's work on this document under XSF
> IPR policy", you don't need to make it Experimental. You can just say this
> and avoid any doubts on whether your XEP is encouraged for Experimental
> implementations or not. And if you think we need a venue that is explicitly
> under XSF IPR policy but not ready for experimental implementations yet,
> then talk to the board.
>

But... that *is* Experimental... Experimental doesn't mandate
implementation, it merely encourages it. And you can implement this, not
that it's required, and I have, not that I had to. Experimental doesn't
even require implementable.

The Process we have literally doesn't have a stage before Submission. So
you're asking, as a Council member, that I should NOT follow our process as
documented in XEP-0001?

Dave.

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]