Request to process/review two submitted Jingle ProtoXEPs

Hello,

I have submitted two related Jingle ProtoXEPs:

1. Jingle T.140 / RTT
2. Jingle Location

Could someone from the XEP Editors / Council, or someone with Jingle 
experience, help process and review these submissions?

Both ProtoXEPs are based on implementation work in Teletyptel 2.0 alpha. 
The software is not production-ready yet, but we have running code and 
practical test results. The goal is to explore accessible total 
conversation over XMPP with audio, video, real-time text and optional 
location sharing.

The main review areas are:

- correct Jingle session design
- whether the proposed features should be separate Jingle contents or 
session metadata
- compatibility with existing Jingle/WebRTC clients
- relationship to T.140, RFC 4103 and XEP-0080
- fallback behavior when the peer does not support the feature
- security and privacy considerations
- whether the split into two ProtoXEPs is correct

I would appreciate help moving these submissions through the correct 
XMPP Standards Foundation process.

Kind regards,

Edward Tie
Tiedragon

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]