Re: running texpire weekly instead of daily?
Adam Funk <a24061-yXNeHEYmD9/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.leafnode |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2012-08-22, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 12.07.2012 13:06, schrieb Adam Funk: >> I have a fairly long retention period in my leafnode configuration, >> and the cron.daily/leafnode job takes about 1 hour to run. (I'm >> running leafnode-2.0.0.alpha20110807b.luascript, and the cron script >> might have been copied from an old Debian/Ubuntu package.) >> >> Is the texpire running time related more to the size of the spool or >> the number of articles that it decides to delete? > > Adam, > > it is the number of articles that matters most, and to how many groups > they are cross-posted. > >> Would it do any harm to run it weekly instead of daily? > > I don't think so, if you can spare the disk space for expired articles > for six more days (which I suppose). There are no implicit dependencies > on texpire being run daily. Leafnode was originally written in the > 1990s when disk space was a premium. :) Thanks. I asked the same question in news.software.readers & was advised to try it & see. In case anyone here is interested, here are the results I got: days texpire h:m:s per m:s per since run million million last time deletions retentions run 1 1:20:56 07:09:06 37:23 1 1:21:23 00:02:03 37:34 1 1:21:59 15:14:27 37:50 1 1:19:31 15:32:24 36:40 1 1:24:04 05:57:46 38:45 1 1:21:09 12:07:42 37:23 1 1:20:09 11:54:04 36:54 4 1:24:11 04:55:53 38:43 7 1:23:34 20:12:31 38:16 7 1:27:13 14:06:30 39:47 7 1:28:35 18:24:21 40:15 (The number of deletions ranged from 142 to 4427; the number retained stayed around 2,100,000.)