Re: weird crash on RHEL-7

On 2014-12-27, 11:23 GMT, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2014-12-26, 01:31 GMT, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Frankly, I am too disinterested in reading autoconf's NEWS file two
>> years after the fact.  My working assumption is that if the packaged
>> "configure" file does not fit the bill, the developer will need the
>> minimum required autoconf version.  I currently have 2.69 here.  With
>> the same commit that bumped the requirement up to 2.68, I also added
>> silent-rules but I haven't commented nor do I remember if there are any
>> special features I am using.  Feel free to kill the PREREQ line and see
>> if it works for your.
>
> I haven't managed to do much larger testing, but it builds 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8485355 on 
> all EPEL6 architectures (x86_64, i686, ppc64; 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5355/8485355/build.log) 
> and your minimalistic testsuite passes.

It also builds (and minimalistic testsuite passes) on all
architectures RHEL-6 proper is build for (s390, s390x, i686,
x86_64, ppc, ppc64) just with this minimal patch

--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ AC_INIT([leafnode],[2.0.0.alpha20140727b
 AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([leafnode.h])
 AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([silent-rules])
 AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])
-AC_PREREQ([2.68])
+AC_PREREQ([2.63])
 AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(leafnode.h)
 AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
 dnl AM_MAINTAINER_MODE

Best,

Matěj

-- 
_______________________________________________
leafnode-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/mailman/listinfo/leafnode-list
http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/