[Licq-devel] Re: to flynd: QSystemTrayIcon
Jon Keating <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.licq.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 18:57, Anders Olofsson wrote: > The QSystemTrayIcon will never appears a window so for those WMs (I saw > it in WindowMaker and IceWM) there is no status icon at all. > > So I see the following options: > > 1) Use the behavior from Eugene's patch and hope that nobody misses the > small status icon on the simpler WMs. Just a quick question. Are there any modern WMs that do not support the KDE docking. QSystemTrayIcon is using the freedesktop.org standard, right? If it is, I think we can just not worry about the larger dock icon. If a user is running a WM that doesn not have the dock icon support, but they are using Qt4, I think it is safe to say they don't care about dock icons. As you said above, WindowsMaker and IceWM support it. I know that fluxbox does, and I imagine blackbox does as well. Gnome and KDE are a given... so the question is, do we really care? Jon > As the current wharf classes do a lot more than is needed by the > QSystemTrayIcon I would like to not implement it like them but instead > make it a separate class (or perhaps just add it to mainwin if the code > is small). My vote is therefor on #5 but it would still be possible to > have the behavior of #4 if that is preferred. Or just go with #1 and drop the current wharf code, as it does a lot of low level X calls that we shouldn't really need anymore. Jon -- ________________________________________________________ Jon Keating ICQ: 16325723 [email protected] MSN: [email protected] http://www.licq.org GPG: 2290A71F http://www.thejon.org HOME: Minamiashigara, Japan