[Licq-devel] Re: group signalling proposal

After looking at the patch, I have to say that yes, that is very simple. Which 
brings to question, do you need the granularity of each type of change? Or 
would just one signal LIST_GROUP_UPDATE would be sufficient? In the patch, 
you treat all types of changes as the same, so it seems that fine granularity 
is not needed.

> I have made a patch for signalling from the daemon to plugins when groups
> are being added, removed, renamed, or reordered. Since there is no good
> group identification (as it was discussed with Anders in irc), plugins are
> only able to tell what happened with groups but cannot tell which exact
> group(s) the action was performed upon. This has to be discussed further.
> Therefore, the daemon patch in attachment is pretty simple.

I missed this conversation on IRC. What exactly is needed?

Jon


-- 
________________________________________________________
Jon Keating                ICQ: 16325723
[email protected]               MSN: [email protected]
http://www.licq.org        GPG: 2290A71F
http://www.thejon.org      HOME: Minamiashigara, Japan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkg25B0ACgkQld1KayKQpx8HpwCg1ezKxQbSMJBaYvWe5lqn3mgC
ftkAn0j+8COs9HmafiPeXRMGslYOYvO5
=piAm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----