Re: [Licq-devel] Migrating trac tickets [help needed]

On 2011-08-08 00:03, Jon Keating wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Anders Olofsson<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>> 741 [icq] Checking if a user is invisible doesn't work
>
> I left it open as a TODO to investigate if it could be done using a
> different method.
> I believe it can be closed and if desired, opened as a new ticket.

>> 1428 [icq] Invalid login sequence being performed
>>     =>  Reported by Jon but not sure what it's referring to.
>
> Licq was sending packets in a different order than the official
> client. It could have been used to detect non-official clients and
> block them. But it looks like that never happened, so it is
> irrelevant.

Alright, two more in the trash that we can forget.


>> 1445 [icq] Licq does not receive messages from icq 5.1
>>     =>  Long discussion with several patches from Jon and it looks like it got
>> partially better (messages working but not file transfers). Did these
>> patches get committed or did they just exist as attachments to this ticket?
>
> I do not recall, you would have to use git grep to see if the changes
> are in or not.

I don't have the ticket attachments but reading the commit headings for 
2007 I could not find anything that seems to be related to this so I 
guess it didn't get committed.
I'm not sure if I want to see the patches or if we just should consider 
this as unconfirmed unless someone can verify with icq 5.1 that it's 
still a problem.


>> 1530 [icq] Server side contactlist damaged after moving users between groups
>>     =>  Confirmed as a known problem / Eugene 2007-08-16
>>     =>  Cause of problem probably found and will fix them next / Jon
>> 2008-04-21
>
> Don't remember this either, looking at gig log for my commits after
> that day should reveal if it was done or not.

Nope, nothing related in the following month. Unless Eugene (or anyone 
else) has anything to add this stays in the unconfirmed list.


The list of unconfirmed bugs is now down to only 15 of the 82 tickets 
open when trac closed. I'll wait a bit more and see if I get any more 
helpful replies here then I'll post on licq-users for help with 
descriptions of what needs to be tested to confirm/reject them and see 
if we can reduce the number a bit more before throwing them away just 
because we're unsure...

/Anders