Re: 1.5b9 released: nanosleep

seems as if
         rqtp.tv_nsec = 1 * 1000 * 1000;  /* specified in nanoseconds. */
was best, at least for me.

i'll figure that out later...

regards,
    thomas

At 05.11.2003 11:11 -0500, you wrote:
>[root@apathy]:[/home/shady/sources/mathopd-1.5b9/src]> make
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H base64.c -o base64.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H cgi.c -o cgi.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H config.c -o config.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H core.c -o core.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H dump.c -o dump.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H imap.c -o imap.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H log.c -o log.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H main.c -o main.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H redirect.c -o redirect.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H request.c -o request.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H util.c -o util.o
>gcc -c -O -Wall -DHAVE_CRYPT_H stub.c -o stub.o
>stub.c: In function `run_children':
>stub.c:685: warning: implicit declaration of function `nanosleep'
>gcc  -o mathopd base64.o cgi.o config.o core.o dump.o imap.o log.o main.o 
>redirect.o request.o util.o stub.o -lcrypt
>
>is the warning something i have to worry about?
>
>mattg
>
>
>Thomas E. Horner wrote:
>>seems as if
>>         rqtp.tv_nsec = 4 * 1000 * 1000;  /* specified in nanoseconds. */
>>is much better
>>At 04.11.2003 18:55 +0000, you wrote:
>>
>>>At 31.10.2003 14:34 +0100, you wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi.
>>>>
>>>>I just put up 1.5b9. This should solve the 'illegal content-length header'
>>>>problem. Also, starting from this release, we no longer try to accept()
>>>>any new clients if there is no connection left to assign them to. That
>>>>means that incoming requests will hang in the kernel, but that is ok I
>>>>guess. At least that is probably better than accepting and immediately
>>>>dropping a connection.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers
>>>>Michiel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>sorry, cpu bug (again).
>>>the bug of cpu consumption during poll that i corrected in phpstub
>>>is in the source code of mathopd again:
>>>
>>>to correct it, change function run_children in stub.c to
>>>
>>>
>>>int run_children(void)
>>>{
>>>         struct pipe_params *p;
>>>
>>>         struct timespec rqtp;
>>>         struct timespec rmtp;
>>>
>>>         rqtp.tv_sec = 0;
>>>         rqtp.tv_nsec = 4 * 1000 * 1000;  /* specified in nanoseconds. */
>>>
>>>         p = children;
>>>         while (p) {
>>>                 if (p->cn)
>>>                 {
>>>                         pipe_run(p);
>>>                         nanosleep(&rqtp,&rmtp);
>>>                 }
>>>                 p = p->next;
>>>         }
>>>         return 0;
>>>}
>>>
>>>
>>>this little 'slowing down' in fact speeds up the process by reducing
>>>the cpu load.
>>>although, i didn't have the time to test and tune it completely.
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>    Thomas
>
>--
>[email protected]
>http://www.shotsfired.org
>[hello to all my fans in domestic surveillance]
>