[bug #18318] bad subnet mask for allowed IPs ?

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #18318 (project mldonkey):

by specifying 172.20.227.255, in "old MLdonkey notation", you're giving
access from 172.20.227.0/24 IPs, or addresses in the range
172.20.227.0-172.20.227.255. That has nothing to do with your network netmask
(beside the fact it's a netmask too).

By the way, recent versions of MLdonkey accept both CIDR and ranges
notations, so you can use them instead of the old notation (which is becoming
deprecated, hence the automatic translation that you noticed).


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?18318>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/