Re: [myrinet] distributed file system
Rob Latham <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.myrinet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I doubt the complexity of NFS is exactly what you need. Perhaps PVFS is a better choice: http://parlweb.parl.clemson.edu/pvfs And here's a paper from the PVFS guys describing the filesystem. In the 'Performance' section, they discuss bandwitdh over myrinet: http://parlweb.parl.clemson.edu/pvfs/el2000/extreme2000.html On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:45:58PM +0200, Alan Scheinine wrote: > What is the fastest way to access files on a remote disk using Myrinet? > This is a very broad question and I will try to narrow it. One can > consider NFS or specialized file systems that keep a local copy. > I tried a distributed file system under development, coda, but (for > me) it was a headache, too many problems arose that required manual > intervention. While I would be interested in hearing about various > file systems -- for example, I am interested in the status of Andrew > file system, it was said to be placed in the public domain, but I have > not heard more -- I would, nonetheless, be happy to obtain NFS as > fast as possible. I am ignorant of the details of NFS, I once read > that it can use either tcp/ip or UDP, and while I realize that Myrinet > can support tcp/ip I wonder if native use of the Myrinet for NFS would > be faster. To return to generalizations, a fast hard disk on a PC > can give a peak of 160 MB and Myrinet can give a bandwidth on the > order of 200 MB, this means that hard disks that are not local should > not be a great bottleneck. But this depends on the latency from > various levels of handling the message, so I wonder if perhaps simple > NFS has been "ported" to Myrinet to reduce the latency. > Alan Scheinine Email: [email protected] > -- [ Rob Latham <[email protected]> ] [ Paralogic Inc. - www.plogic.com - www.xtreme-machines.com ]