Re: MPICH-GM 1.2.5..9.
"Christopher D. Maestas" <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:33:54 -0700 (MST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.myrinet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Patrick, In trying to keep things as simple as possible we used: mpicc which called icc, that linked to the mpich library compiled with the intel compilers. And the same for gcc, mpicc -> gcc -lmpich (compiled with gcc) And the same for pgi, mpicc -> pgcc -lmpich (compiled with pgi suite) I haven't tried a hybrid or can't remember trying it :-) mpicc -> icc -lmpich (compiled with gcc) I can try it ... or rather put it on the list to try ... Regards, On 24 Feb 2003, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 13:45, Christopher D. Maestas wrote: > > Yes there is a performance benefit in using mpich-gm with intel versus gcc. > > mpich-gm compilations with the intel compiler are comparable to mpich-gm > > compilations with the pgi compilers. When testing hpl runs with the differently > > compiled mpich-gm releases, the intel and pgi compiled versions gave better results > > than the gcc compiled version. > > Do you compile HPL with gcc or with the Intel compiler when linking with > MPICH-GM compiled with gcc ? > > Patrick > -- Chris