Re: MPICH-GM 1.2.5..9.

"Christopher D. Maestas" <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:33:54 -0700 (MST)
Newsgroups gmane.network.myrinet.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Patrick,

In trying to keep things as simple as possible we used:
	mpicc
which called icc, that linked to the mpich library compiled with the intel compilers.

And the same for gcc,
	mpicc -> gcc -lmpich (compiled with gcc)
And the same for pgi,
	mpicc -> pgcc -lmpich (compiled with pgi suite)

I haven't tried a hybrid or can't remember trying it :-) 
	mpicc -> icc -lmpich (compiled with gcc)

I can try it ... or rather put it on the list to try ...

Regards,

On 24 Feb 2003, Patrick Geoffray wrote:

> Hi Christopher,
> 
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 13:45, Christopher D. Maestas wrote:
> > Yes there is a performance benefit in using mpich-gm with intel versus gcc.
> > mpich-gm compilations with the intel compiler are comparable to mpich-gm
> > compilations with the pgi compilers.  When testing hpl runs with the differently
> > compiled mpich-gm releases, the intel and pgi compiled versions gave better results
> > than the gcc compiled version.
> 
> Do you compile HPL with gcc or with the Intel compiler when linking with
> MPICH-GM compiled with gcc ?
> 
> Patrick
> 

--  Chris