Re: MPICH-GM 1.2.5..9.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:20:23PM -0700, Christopher D. Maestas wrote:

> I still maintain that on an end to end approach, the intel compiler suite would
> give better performance than the gcc suite, especially when trying to take
> advantage of Itanium2 and XEON intructions sets.  So with that in mind, there is
> still an advantage in compiling mpich-gm with the intel compilers over gcc.

I thought you said you'd actually done it and measured the difference.

If there's no proven performance advantage to compiling the Myrinet
stuff with the Intel compiler, then why should Myricom work around
bugs in the Intel compiler?

greg