Re: check_procs is doubling the answer...?
Jam Mulch <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:08:42 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nagios.plugins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <567B1B6A.5030109__38193.6120255434$1450908543$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Your command line example uses a different IP address from the IP address in the notification email. 170.94.181.3 vs 170.94.164.70 On 12/21/2015 11:15 AM, Jeffrey Westgate wrote: > I'm confused by the different numbers. Please help - I believe this is misreporting.... > > When I run it on the 'affected' box: > > [root@secirs1<mailto:root@secirs1> plugins]# ./check_procs > PROCS OK: 76 processes > > > when running from my nagios server: > > [root@nagios<mailto:root@nagios>]# /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_procs -m PROCS 170.94.181.3 > PROCS WARNING: 194 processes > > and the 'warning email' I get: > > ***** Nagios ***** > > Notification Type: PROBLEM > > Service: HOST-PROCS > Host: secirs1.state.ar.us > Address: 170.94.164.70 > State: WARNING > > Date/Time: Mon Dec 21 09:33:41 CST 2015 > > Additional Info: > > PROCS WARNING: 152 processes > > > Yes, it's an older box, Scientific Linux, but we didn't start getting warning until this past week. so, I believe the error is fairly new. Load hasn't changed, as box is mostly idle. Less than 80 processes is the normal state of this machine. > > And, the kicker - it only appears to be this box with the 'off' numbers, but we have ... several... similarly built boxes that are reporting much more accurate numbers. > > [root@secirs1<mailto:root@secirs1> plugins]# uname -a > Linux secirs1.state.ar.us 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Sep 6 18:52:56 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > -- > Jeff Westgate > DIS UNIX System Administration > 501-682-5231 > >