Re: Unstable tests
Bill Fenner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF4SogafzQcanxcSm4Mu+g9zRVresXWkMZMNhj4pYkwE10mchg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Eric S. Raymond <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill Fenner <[email protected]>: > > By "test 31" do you mean "snmpv1 traps are sent by snmpd API"? > > Now I'm getting a different result, which is a little disturbing in itself: > > com2sec directive > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 31 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 30 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Files=76, Tests=327, 109 wallclock secs ( 0.28 usr 0.07 sys + 13.58 cusr > 4.74 csys = 18.67 CPU) > Result: FAIL > So before, you meant you failed test 31 of the "com2sec directive" suite? Try "cd testing; SNMP_VERBOSE=2 ./RUNFULLTESTS -v -r T070com2sec" to get more detail about why it failed. Test 30 and 31 could fail if your DNS resolver performs "helpful" NXDOMAIN remapping - e.g., does > ping no.such.address. return ping: unknown host no.such.address. or does it return something like PING no.such.address (92.242.140.21) 56(84) bytes of data. There's an assumption in the test suite that the DNS server is not insane, but of course most home ISPs provide insane DNS servers by default. Most providers give you the option to use a sane one, or of course you could change your /etc/resolv.conf to point to a sane public DNS provider. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders