Re: Unstable tests
Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/31/18 22:19, Keith Mendoza wrote: > I personally feel that whoever is running the automated tests should > make the necessary changes to their environment to resolve any > hostname that is needed to run the tests. I don't have root access to the BSD and AIX systems that I use for testing Net-SNMP. So modifying /etc/resolv.conf or equivalent on these systems is not an option. > From a software development and testing point-of-view I feel that we > will eventually get caught in expanding the number of hostnames that > will have to be handled by all the hostname resolution utility > functions in snmplib/system.c. I haven't had a chance to do a complete > analysis of how many each of the *gethostbyname* function variants are > used through the net-snmp code base; so, I'm not going to speak as to > whether these changes is limited to netsnmp_gethostbyname_v4(), or > should be applied elsewhere. That's not correct. onea.net-snmp.org and twoa.net-snmp.org are the only two that need special handling. If more functions than netsnmp_gethostbyname_v4() would have to recognize these hostnames, we can refactor the host name resolution functions such that only one function needs to know about these special hostnames. Bart. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot