Re: Unstable tests

Keith Mendoza <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.devel
Message-ID <1523747655.2645030.1338185536.3F2D363E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Not ideal; but I guess it'll have to do for now.

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, at 3:56 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 04/05/18 16:38, Lee wrote:
> > On 4/5/18, Keith Mendoza  wrote:
> >> So again, at what point do we stop adding code to net-snmp because
> >> ISP's are messing around as if they're doing us a favor by letting us
> >> use their services?
> > 
> > Since people don't read the docs, how about adding a test to see if
> > dns is borked; if it is link to a faq entry for possible ways to fix
> > it.
> > 
> > verizon 'opt out of dns assistance' link:
> >    https://www.verizon.com/support/residential/internet/home-network/settings/opt-out-of-dns-assist
> 
> How about the patch below? With this patch applied Net-SNMP developers can
> make the tests pass easily by setting the NETSNMP_DNS_WORKAROUND environment
> variable before running the tests and normal operation of snmpd is not
> affected.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> 
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] snmplib: Avoid that test T070com2sec_simple fails due 
> to DNS filtering
> 
> ---
>  snmplib/system.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/snmplib/system.c b/snmplib/system.c
> index d7f06f74087f..28b832352247 100644
> --- a/snmplib/system.c
> +++ b/snmplib/system.c
> @@ -762,6 +762,24 @@ netsnmp_validator_context(void)
>  int
>  netsnmp_gethostbyname_v4(const char* name, in_addr_t *addr_out)
>  {
> +    if (getenv("NETSNMP_DNS_WORKAROUND")) {
> +        /*
> +         * A hack that avoids that T070com2sec_simple fails due to the 
> DNS
> +         * client filtering out 127.0.0.x addresses and/or redirecting 
> DNS
> +         * resolution failures to a web page.
> +         */
> +        if (strcmp(name, "onea.net-snmp.org") == 0) {
> +            *addr_out = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK);
> +            return 0;
> +        } else if (strcmp(name, "twoa.net-snmp.org") == 0) {
> +            *addr_out = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK + 1);
> +            return 0;
> +        } else if (strcmp(name, "no.such.address.") == 0) {
> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    {
>  #if HAVE_GETADDRINFO
>      struct addrinfo *addrs = NULL;
>      struct addrinfo hint;
> @@ -826,6 +844,7 @@ netsnmp_gethostbyname_v4(const char* name, in_addr_t 
> *addr_out)
>  #else /* HAVE_GETIPNODEBYNAME */
>      return -1;
>  #endif
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  int
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-coders mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


-- 
Thanks,
Keith (pantherse)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.