Re: DISMAN PING MIB test case question

After looking further into what's going on with T154_dismanpingmib_simple, I discovered that the test script checks if the UID is 0 before it checks if disman/ping was enabled. https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/merge-requests/16/ reorders the check to prevent any confusion when the module is not enabled at all.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Keith Mendoza wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, at 9:20 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Keith Mendoza <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Bill,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > > > I do not think the DISMAN PING module builds anywhere but Linux.  I am
> > > not
> > > > a fan of the existing implementation since it is synchronous.
> > >
> > > Would it be worth it to update RUNFULLTEST or T154dismanpingmib_simple to
> > > only run on Linux?
> > >
> > 
> >  T154dismanpingmib_simple runs if the module is compiled in (e.g.,
> > --with-mib-modules=disman/ping), which it isn't by default.
> 
> After I checked-out the v5.8pre3 tag, and ran autoreconf and configure 
> --enable-blumenthal-aes --with-defaults --with-openssl=<Path to my 
> OpenSSL install>; I went ahead and took a closer look at the 
> configuration summary. I spotted the following items in "Agent MIB 
> code": disman/event disman/schedule
> 
> I'll double-check if these 2 are actually enabling 
> T154dismanpingmib_simple and get back to the group with what I find.
> 
> > 
> >   Bill
> 
> Now, regarding rerunning autoreconf: When I run this git reports that 
> aclocal.m4 and configure are modified.
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Keith (pantherse)


-- 
Thanks,
Keith (pantherse)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot