Re: DISMAN PING MIB test case question
Keith Mendoza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1525104661.3514864.1355764208.7C908743@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, at 9:20 AM, Bill Fenner wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Keith Mendoza <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Bill, > > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Bill Fenner wrote: > > > I do not think the DISMAN PING module builds anywhere but Linux. I am > > not > > > a fan of the existing implementation since it is synchronous. > > > > Would it be worth it to update RUNFULLTEST or T154dismanpingmib_simple to > > only run on Linux? > > > > T154dismanpingmib_simple runs if the module is compiled in (e.g., > --with-mib-modules=disman/ping), which it isn't by default. After I checked-out the v5.8pre3 tag, and ran autoreconf and configure --enable-blumenthal-aes --with-defaults --with-openssl=<Path to my OpenSSL install>; I went ahead and took a closer look at the configuration summary. I spotted the following items in "Agent MIB code": disman/event disman/schedule I'll double-check if these 2 are actually enabling T154dismanpingmib_simple and get back to the group with what I find. > > Bill Now, regarding rerunning autoreconf: When I run this git reports that aclocal.m4 and configure are modified. -- Thanks, Keith (pantherse) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot