Re: RFC: fix --enable-read-only build failure due to snmpping

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 08:01:12PM -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2018 12:12:18 -0700 Wes wrote:
> WH> Robert Story <[email protected]> writes:
> WH> 
> WH> > On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:25:03 -0400 Bill wrote:  
> WH> > BF> Since snmpping requires set support, it should be
> WH> > BF> conditional. My proposed patch is  
> WH> >
> WH> > I don't think this meets the criteria for a show-stopper,
> WH> > since it's not part of the default build.  
> WH> 
> WH> It breaks that configure option entirely without the patch.
> WH> It's a +1 for me since it breaks compilation entirely if that
> WH> configure option is specified.
> 
> Yes, but it doesn't break for a default configure, which is the
> criteria for a show stopper in the RC phase. Of course +3 votes for
> anything is an automatic show stopper too, so we're one vote away
> from that.

+1

/MF

> Robert
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-coders mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot