Re: A discussion about moving to GitHub from SF (again)
Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/2/19 2:28 PM, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > Previously [1] we agreed to moved at least the code base to GitHub, with > work on moving the wiki and other things as well. Shortly after that > decision was made, GitHub was bought out by MS and the consensus changed > to "hold and wait till we see what the fallout might be". It appears, > at least publicly, that no changes are to be made in the near future to > GitHub's operational model. Thus, it's time to reconsider whether we > should make the move or whether people have concerns worth addressing. > > Thoughts? Hi Wes, My best wishes for the new year! Regarding GitHub versus SourceForge: during the past few weeks none of my git pushes to SF failed. That's a significant improvement. However, SF is still an order of magnitude slower than GitHub. Additionally, all continuous integration services I'm familiar with support GitHub but none of them support SF. So I think there are at least two reasons to reconsider the migration of the code base to GitHub. There may be other reasons that I overlooked. See also https://blog.github.com/2017-11-07-github-welcomes-all-ci-tools/. Bart.