Re: Netsnmpv5.8 possible security flaw

Robert Story <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Madhusudhana,

Did you go back and confirm Wes' theory? Did you see an authPriv
request which failed, followed by and auth request that succeeded?

Robert


On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 04:19:28 +0000 Madhusudhana wrote:
MR> Thanks Wes. 
MR> 
MR> -----Original Message-----
MR> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[email protected]] 
MR> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 10:08 PM
MR> 
MR> Madhusudhana R <[email protected]> writes:
MR> 
MR> > Can you please let me know whether this feature is added
MR> > newly in v5.8 or it was an existing feature in v5.7.3 ?
MR> > If it is a new feature in v5.8, is there a way to toggle some
MR> > MACRO value to make sure an user with authpriv protocol will
MR> > always responds in encrypted way?  
MR> 
MR> It's not new at all; that behavior has been around since the
MR> creation of the SNMPv3 code within Net-SNMP (which at the time
MR> was called UCD-SNMP, showing how old this concept is).  At the
MR> time, encryption wasn't even possible for everyone deploying
MR> the code (and the only encryption supported was DES).  The
MR> world tended to also believe that authentication (ensuring
MR> packets weren't modified) was a "must have" but encryption was
MR> merely a "would be nice if you could, but it's not critical".
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.