Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add support for interface binding

Anders Wallin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.devel
Message-ID <CAF2baFeaQdE2yvPGfSHCrMAhtV8h2xE3o+MndXScuVQHLzYNsA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bill,

I'm missing updates to the documentation/man pages. (I can't find that the
man pages are update with @iface either)

BR
Anders

ons 23 jan. 2019 kl 06:16 skrev Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>:

> On 1/22/19 12:40 PM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:26 AM Bart Van Assche <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 11/6/18 8:03 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> >      > Given your proposed code structure, I imagine that we could add
> >     network
> >      > namespaces to netsnmp_ep too - this basically ends up using
> >     "socketat(
> >      > /* magic */, family, type, protocol )" instead of socket() to
> >     create the
> >      > socket, and the magic can be derived from what we store in ep.
> >
> >     That sounds like a good idea to me.
> >
> >
> > I've finally done this, and would like to request some eyes on it before
> > I push it to 5-8-patches.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/fenner/net-snmp/compare/V5-8-patches...fenner:linux-namespace
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> The following new code in netsnmp_parse_ep_str() looks a bit fragile to me:
>
>              cp = strchr(iface, '@');
>              if (!cp)
>                  cp = strchr(iface, ':');
>
> Wouldn't it be better to backtrack to the previous value of 'cp' if no
> second '@' sign is found? That will avoid that this code fails if
> support for a new delimiter between '@' and ':' would be added.
>
> The following code looks unusual to me:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_SETNS
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <sys/socket.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> #include <sched.h>
> #include <net-snmp/library/snmp_assert.h>
> #endif
>
> I'm not aware of any other Net-SNMP code that guards include directives
> with the result of a test for a system call.
>
> Otherwise the code looks fine to me. But please keep in mind that I only
> had a quick look at it.
>
> Bart.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-coders mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
>

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.