Re: querry related to row status and index of a table
Aditya Kulkarni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Robert. That clarifies a lot of things. Aditya Kulkarni On 7/14/05, Robert Story <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:32:59 +0530 Aditya wrote: > AK> Related to "Row Status" > AK> ------------------------------- > AK> [1] Do SNMP standards recommend using a field of type "Row Status" in > AK> a table entry? > > Yes. > > AK> [2] Do management applications built on top of SNMP expect the > AK> presence of "Row Status" field in an entry of a modifiable table? > > No. > > AK> [3] Is it a common practice to use "Row Status"? > > Yes. > > AK> Related to access specifier of index field of table > AK> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > AK> [1] When I used a tool like mibdesigner to create a MIB and > AK> AdventNet's MIBBrowser, the tools say that MAX-ACCESS of index field > AK> should be not-accessible? However I have seen MIBs which have > AK> read-only index fields. What is the right way to go about this? > > Not-accessible. It doesn't make sense to have it accessible, since it's part of > the index, and thus would be redundant. > > AK> [2] Do SNMP standards have some recommendations in this regard? > > Yes, not-accessible. > > AK> [3] Can the index be ever read-write? > > No. You must do an add/delete combo. > > AK> Related to string based index > AK> --------------------------------------- > AK> [1] Is it generally a good idea to avoid a string based index? In my > AK> opinion, it seems so, but wanted some expert opinion in this regard? > > No, there isn't a real reason to avoid string indexes. > > -- > NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted > unless they are requests for paid consulting services. > > Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie > Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> > Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> > > You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. > -- Best Wishes, Aditya Kulkarni ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users