AW: Interfaces reports as down (I am really stuck!)

Hi All!

Well, I don't get the hang like before, but now all of the interfaces are showing as down:


snmpwalk -v 1 -c public 127.0.0.1 ifOperStatus
IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.1 = INTEGER: down(2)
IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.2 = INTEGER: down(2)
IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.3 = INTEGER: down(2)


Here is the contents of the snmpd.log:

kernel_sunos5: registered alarm 1 with period 5s
kernel_sunos5: registered alarm 2 with period 30s
NET-SNMP version 5.2.1
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (1, *, 152, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 0 time 0 ttl 30 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ...... getif lo0
kernel_sunos5: ........ admin 1
kernel_sunos5: ........ oper 2
kernel_sunos5: ...... getif dmfe0
kernel_sunos5: ........ admin 1
kernel_sunos5: ........ oper 2
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (6, *, 120, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 0 time 0 ttl 300 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib (260, 22, ...)
kernel_sunos5: ...... modules pushed OK
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ... result 1 rc 0
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ...... getif dmfe1
kernel_sunos5: ........ admin 1
kernel_sunos5: ........ oper 2
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (6, *, 120, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 1 time 300 ttl 300 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib (260, 22, ...)
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ... result 1 rc 0
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ... result 1 rc 0
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (1, *, 152, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 1 time 30 ttl 30 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ... result 0 rc -1
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (1, *, 152, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 1 time 30 ttl 30 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ... result 0 rc -1
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (1, *, 152, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 1 time 30 ttl 30 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ...... getif lo0
kernel_sunos5: ........ admin 1
kernel_sunos5: ........ oper 1
kernel_sunos5: ...... getif dmfe0
kernel_sunos5: ........ admin 1
kernel_sunos5: ........ oper 1
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (6, *, 120, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 1 time 300 ttl 300 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib (260, 22, ...)
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ... result 1 rc 0
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ...... getif dmfe1
kernel_sunos5: ........ admin 1
kernel_sunos5: ........ oper 1
kernel_sunos5: getMibstat (6, *, 120, 1, *, *)
kernel_sunos5: ... cache_valid 1 time 300 ttl 300 now 1124311236
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib (260, 22, ...)
kernel_sunos5: ...... getmib returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ... result 1 rc 0
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: ... result 1 rc 0
kernel_sunos5: ... getMibstat returns 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[0] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[1] time 30 ttl 30
kernel_sunos5: cache[2] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[3] time 0 ttl 60
kernel_sunos5: cache[4] time 0 ttl 60
kernel_sunos5: cache[5] time 0 ttl 30
kernel_sunos5: cache[6] time 300 ttl 300
kernel_sunos5: cache[7] time 0 ttl 60
kernel_sunos5: cache[8] time 0 ttl 60
kernel_sunos5: cache[9] time 0 ttl 30
kernel_sunos5: cache[10] time 0 ttl 30
kernel_sunos5: cache[11] time 0 ttl 30
kernel_sunos5: cache[12] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[13] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[14] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[15] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[16] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[17] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[18] time 0 ttl 0
kernel_sunos5: cache[19] time 0 ttl 0


>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Robert Story [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. August 2005 11:55
>> An: Mohr James
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: Interfaces reports as down (I am really stuck!)
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 08:10:42 +0200 Mohr wrote:
>> MJ> I hate to be a pest, but could you send the patch again? For 
>> MJ> whatever reason, I did not get it in the original mail Thanks!
>> 
>> No problem, my fault, pestering is the right thing in this 
>> case... patch attached..
>> 
>> -- 
>> NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, 
>> will be deleted
>>       unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
>> 
>> Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
>> Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> 
>> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>  
>> Archive: 
>> >> <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
>> 
>> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 
>> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users