RE: high speed monitoring

Bruce Shaw <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <942CA19082ED6F46AE1CD8C4A0A9A66D08AE5F37@excedm2gwba.env.gov.ab.ca>
>This is not a problem in our case, seeing as we have two separate
>networks. One for data and one for control (management). So what we
>monitor will not be afected.

Oh, yes it will.  It still takes CPU cycles to process the information and
generate the necessary SNMP packets.  If you're hammering the CPU once every
millisecond to do this, it isn't going to have much time for anything else.

This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is
addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action
relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply,
should be deleted or destroyed.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.