RE: high speed monitoring
Bruce Shaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <942CA19082ED6F46AE1CD8C4A0A9A66D08AE5F37@excedm2gwba.env.gov.ab.ca> |
>This is not a problem in our case, seeing as we have two separate >networks. One for data and one for control (management). So what we >monitor will not be afected. Oh, yes it will. It still takes CPU cycles to process the information and generate the necessary SNMP packets. If you're hammering the CPU once every millisecond to do this, it isn't going to have much time for anything else. This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users