Re: option -i for monitor?
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 14:03 +0200, Loic Domaigne wrote: > I have applied your patch, and I confirm: the inform is sent as expected. Good. I'll commit that patch to the CVS code. > However, there's still an issue in the varbinds of the inform. > UCD-SNMP-MIB::prNames.2 = Wrong Type: NULL > UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrMessage.2 = Wrong Type: NULL > The proc monitor was defined in the snmpd.conf was: > monitor -u lodo -r 10 -o prNames -o prErrMessage "proc" prErrorFlag != 0 Hmmmm... OK - the good news is that I've managed to reproduce the problem, and will have a look at it tonight. The other good news is that I've got a workaround. If you add a line: iquerySecName lodo to the snmpd.conf file, the trap payload list should be as expected. [Now to find out why the bare '-u' form doesn't seem to work...] Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users