[SLV]RE: private mib definition problem

Dave

I try it ,good idea, thanks
 
Chunmei

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 2005年10月19日 16:21
To: Chunmei Dai(CD)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: private mib definition problem

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 16:10 +0800, Chunmei Dai(CD) wrote:
> 1.I want a 64 bit INTEGER as a table’s index. Then I use
> SYNTAX  “Counter64” as this table’s index

This is not allowed.
>From RFC 2578, section 7.7:

   Since a single value of a Counter has (in general) no information
   content (see section 7.1.6 and 7.1.10), objects defined using the
   syntax, Counter32 or Counter64, must not be specified in an INDEX
   clause



> 2.complie this mib file using tool “adventnet simulation toolkit”.
> This tool give me following message:

>    ERR-162    The objects having the syntax Counter32 or
>               Counter64, must not be specified in an INDEX clause.


Quite correct.


> My question is why I can’t using SYNTAX “Counter64” as a table’s index

See above.

>  if can’t using it ,which syntax I can use? 

Pretty much *any* syntax other than Counter32 and Counter64.
Why not use two 32-bit integer index values.  That would give
the same effect as a single 64-bit integer.

Dave


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users