RE: Re: Initial release of the Bacula SNMP Subagent - v1.2

Les Mikesell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.cacti.user,gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 16:54, Darren Gamble wrote:

> > Mostly unrelated question: do you happen to know who to
> > complain to about Linux x86_64 interface traffic stats
> > from net-snmp being incorrect as reported by cacti?
> > The target is Centos3.x (should be the same as RHEL3) with
> > cacti running on a 32-bit Centos4 box.  After a reboot the
> > values are correct for a while, then go crazy, showing
> > 100 Meg traffic (the interface limit) most of the time.
> 
> Cacti (usually) just uses net-snmp's agent to get the data, so the issue is
> probably "garbage in, garbage out".  I had seen problems a few months ago
> (and posted here) where a 64-bit net-snmp agent will return a
> greater-than-Counter32 value for a Counter32 value, which causes funny
> results on the net-snmp 32-bit client side, especially when a snmpwalk is
> being done. Interestingly enough, if the client was also 64-bit, then it
> would "properly" report the bad value as it was transmitted.  I don't see
> this problem anymore with recent versions of net-snmp.

What's supposed to happen when the value doesn't fit in a Counter32?
On a box where:
IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: eth0
IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: eth1
snmpwalk says:
IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.2 = Counter32: 149182455
IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.3 = Counter32: 0
but ifconfig shows:
eth0   TX bytes:149179729 (142.2 Mb)
eth1   TX bytes:33033390619 (31503.0 Mb)

This is an older version but with RH based systems it's hard to tell
what fixes have been backported to old version numbers.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   [email protected]




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.