Re: Net-SNMP 5.2.1.2 Win32 vs. HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad

On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 10:13 +0100, Winfried Neessen wrote:
> > On a Unix-based system, the usual advice is to monitor the
> > UCD-SNMP-MIB::laTable (for the Unix 1, 5 and 15 minute load
> > averages).  I'm not sure whether this works under Windows,
> > but it's worth a look.
> > 
> Yep you are right, but also this doesn't seem to be implemented
> correctly for the Win32 Net-SNMPd. 

Not implemented correctly?
Or not implemented at all?

Do you happen to know what the natural form(s) of load information
are on Windows systems?   The HostResources implementation (and
related MIBs)  is probably next on my list of modules to review,
and we might as well try to design any private replacements to
be as flexible as possible.

Dave


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users