Re: SNMP Proxy
Nicolas Cogne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Dave,
It is working fine now. Thank you very much for your great support.
Best regards
Nicolas Cogne
Dave Shield a écrit :
>On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:49 +0100, Nicolas Cogne wrote:
>
>
>>>What does
>>>
>>> snmpget -v 1 -c public localhost:7071 .1.3.6.1.4.1.2390.1.3.1.1.0
>>>
>>>give?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>my subagent answers correctly:
>>
>>
>
>OK - so the problem is on the master agent side.
>
>
>
>
>>I send you back the two configuration files:
>>snmpd.conf for the master agent (5.1.2 master agent).
>>subagent.conf for the subagent (4.2.3 subagent).
>>
>>
>
>
>OK - I think I've spotted the problem.
>Or to be strictly accurate, the *two* problems.
>
>In the "snmpd.conf" file you have the following:
>
> # sec.name source community
> com2sec notConfigUser default public
> com2sec localro default public
>
>
>So there are two security names specified for the
>communmity name "public" (not counting the host
>specific one).
>
>These get mapped to "notConfigGroup" and "localrogp"
>respectively, when then use the following access
>settings:
>
>access notConfigGroup "" any noauth exact systemview ....
>access localrogp "" any noauth exact ferma ....
>
>
>I assume that you want "public" requests to use the
>localro/localrogp entries, but the agent is probably
>picking up the first match ("notConfig*") instead.
>
>So the master agent is allowing access to the system group (and
>hrSystem) - but nothing else. That's the first problem - you
>need to get rid of the notConfig* settings.
>
>
>The second problem is that I can't immediately spot where
>the view "ferma" is defined. So I strongly suspect that
>this view does not exist, and the "localro*" settings won't
>work either. You need to define an appropriate view "ferma".
>
>
>
>Quite honestly, I wouldn't recommend that you use the
>com2sec/group/view/access settings at all. It's a lot
>simpler to use the basic "rocommunity"/"rwcommunity"
>directives instead. That way you only need one line,
>not five or more.
>
>Dave
>
>
>