| Newsgroups |
gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
After extracting the net-snmp components out of my app and testing
memory growth it appears to be stable. I must have jumped to the
wrong conclusion :-(
This is the case for both ucd-snmp and net-snmp.
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:00:56 +0000 Dave Shield
<[email protected]> wrote:
>[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
> any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
> or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
> Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
> and offer advice. Thanks. ]
>
>On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:43 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
>> I can try to move to Net-SNMP I guess, but that would mean
>> that I have to re-write all my existing code.
>
>No.
>We've got more MIB modules than you have, and we didn't
>want to have to rewrite them either :-)
>
>
>> Is there any backward compatability?
>
>Yes.
>
>> Would the code in my example still work?
>
>Yes.
>
>Dave
Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required
http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480
Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
https://www.hushssl.com?l=485
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users