Re: query about agentx - getbulk support..

Dave Shield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 03:06 -0800, vijendra agarwal wrote:
> Can you please let me know if there is any plan to implement getbulk
> of agentx protocol in near future?

There's no explicit timetable for implementing this functionality, no.
It is listed in the Feature Requests tracker (#1379500), but that's
no guarantee as to how soon anyone will actually tackle the job.

It'll probably depend on someone who needs to make use of this feature
being prepared/able to do the work (or to fund someone else to do it!)


> I know around 20% of code flow and data structure used by net-snmp.
> I have good knowledge about C. so can you tell me,  how much time 
> approx will it take if I try to implement it?

I really couldn't suggest a meaningful estimate.  It might be a
two-minute job, since most of the bits are in place.   The agent
*does* support the AgentX GetBulk protocol request - it simply
doesn't try to use it.  So tweaking the register_agentx routine
to include HANDLER_CAN_GETBULK *might* be sufficient  (except
that it seems to already do this).

But much of this code probably hasn't been tested, and there are
a lot of subtle problems in GetBulk handling.  So getting it to
work reliably might be a long hard slog.  I really don't know.


Dave


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.