Antwort: Re: Re: Contained Sequences

No need to get tetchy, I was only asking...

Your explanation could well be correct, it was some time ago and not
something I was directly involved in.

I wouldn't be a particurlary good engineer if I accepted *everything* at
face value now, would I?

No offence intended, but my experience with academia has not always been
equitable. A good number of academic types have responded with "won't"
rather than "can't". I need to figure out which one applies here.

Between this "problem" and other problems, I am beginning to wonder if
selecting CMIP/CMISE would not have been preferrable...

Enjoy the rest of your day.



                                                                           
             "Dave Shield"                                                 
             <[email protected]                                             
             iv.ac.uk>                                                  An 
             Gesendet von:              "[email protected] 
             dave.shield@googl          m"                                 
             email.com                  <[email protected] 
                                        m>                                 
                                                                     Kopie 
             25.07.2006 17:24           [email protected] 
                                        et                                 
                                                                     Thema 
                                        Re: Re: Contained Sequences        
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




On 25/07/06, [email protected] wrote:
> Is that true? Or is it just not supported in Net-SNMP?

No - it's a fundamental part of SNMP.
You can *NOT* have a table-within-a-table

> I am pretty sure I have seen this done in other SNMP V2 agents, Wind
> River's built-in SNMP Agent in Tornado, for example. I am also pretty
sure
> that I have seen this supported in HP OpenView....

It is quite possible that particular management tools will take a pair
of parallel tables and *display* them as if one was within the other.
But it's not possible to *define* them as such - SNMP does not support
this.  Full Stop.

I can dig out chapter and verse if you don't believe me?

Dave



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users