Re: didn't net-snmp support leaf nods too deep?
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/07/06, 蔷<Qiang Hu> <[email protected]> wrote: > as you can see ,when i just gave the values of firstKey ,secondKey and > thirdKey in C code,why all the values are respectively given to > firstGroup,secondGroup and 3. Because you didn't register the module correctly. Probably - there's not exactly much to go on here. > it seems that net-snmp did not support leaf > nods too deep! Of course it does! Just look at the other modules that we ship. Many of them report leaf nodes at a relatively deep level. > is it right ?or i had to do something wrong. What could you possibly have done wrong? Let's see - how about: - Not providing sufficient information about your code (despite being prodded over exactly this mistake in another thread). - Asking what is essentially the same question as the previous (active!) thread. - Not being prepared to wait to see what comes out of that discussion. I've just answered this same problem in the other thread - I don't really appreciate being expected to repeat myself again here! You are not paying anything towards the support of this project - can you please have the decency not to overload those who *volunteer* to provide advice and assistance. Thank You. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users