Re: multiple Sub-agents managing the same table

"Arnaud BODENAN" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks.


>From: "Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
>To: "Arnaud BODENAN" <[email protected]>
>CC: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: multiple Sub-agents managing the same table
>Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:56:07 +0100
>
>On 04/09/06, Arnaud BODENAN <[email protected]> wrote:
> >         
>netsnmp_register_table_data_set(netsnmp_create_handler_registration
> >                                     ("genServerTable",
> >                                      NULL,
> >                                      genServerTableOid,
> >                                      genServerTableOidLen,
> >                                      HANDLER_CAN_RWRITE), 
>genServerTable,
> > NULL);
>
>But that's registering the whole table.
>You don't want to do that - you need to register individual rows.
>
> > Moreover, when I execute the second binary, I have no error message so 
>it
> > seems to work ok.
>
>Well, given that you don't actually check the return value of the
>netsnmp_register_xxx
>call, that feels something of an optimistic assumption!
>
>
>As I said - the Net-SNMP agent has typically been used for
>implementing full OID subtrees (i.e. complete tables) and most of the
>helper modules have been designed with that model in mind.  If you're
>trying to split a table across several subagents, you're going to have
>to do a *lot* more work yourself.
>
>Start by having a look at the AgentX specifications, where it talks
>about "OID ranges".  That's the model that has been used in the
>Net-SNMP agent, so it's important to understand how this works before
>proceeding.
>    Then you'll have to register each row individually (probably in
>addition to registering the whole table) - which I suspect will
>require using the 'agent_registry.c' APIs.
>
>I'm afraid that you're on somewhat uncharted territory here, and
>there's a limit to the amount of help we can provide.  I'm not sure
>any of the core developers have actually tried to implement such a
>split-agent table.
>       [If I'm wrong about this, now would be a good time to speak up!!]
>
>And I give you due warning - the two or three weeks before the start
>of a new academic year is *the* busiest period of the whole year for
>me, so I won't have much time or energy for non-essential stuff (like
>this project).
>
>Good Luck.
>
>Dave
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job 
>easier
>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>Net-snmp-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.