Re: multiple Sub-agents managing the same table
"Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/09/06, Arnaud BODENAN <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed, this handler is written to handle tables registered from the rootOid > corresponding to the Oid of the Table. Yes. > The problem is that with registration > of a region of MIB, the rootOid corresponds to the index of the table. In which case, this is not registering a table - so using the table helper isn't really appropriate. > Here is my workaround (hardcoded for the moment): [snip] Uggh! Still, if it works for you - then fair enough. Nevertheless - Ugghh!! > Now, I want to know how this bug can be corrected in a safe and clean manner... Well the first thing to establish - what exactly *is* the bug here? (if any) I'm inclined to suggest that it's actually a case of using the wrong tool for the job. And what might be needed is a new mib2c config, specifically designed to handle individual table rows. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users