Re: Need Confirmation about Table Under a Table

Hello Dave,

> No - keep the same three tables, but add an extra object to the INDEX
clause.
> So that the tables are now indexed by 'ifIndex' plus the previous indices.

I am not much aware of using ifIndex as of concept is concerned its fine
can you guide me any kind of reference or Docs form where I can get the
information, so that I can implement using ifIndex


>
> As far as the structure of the MIB is concerned, these are "completely
> separate" tables (so you don't have a table-under-a-table, which is
> invalid).  But because there's a shared index object ifIndex), your
> tables can be merged with the standard ifTable, to mimic the effect of
> a set of tables-within-a-table.
>
> You do *not* need to define four separate copies of each table.
>
>
> Dave
>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users