Re: Problems with Monitor

>From: Dave Shield <[email protected]>
>Sent: Oct 11, 2006 8:25 AM
>To: James Mckenzie <[email protected]>
>Cc: NET SNMP List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Problems with Monitor
>
>On 11/10/06, James Mckenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You are correct with the monitor line, with the exception that I HAVE to specify a user
>> using the -u parameter.
>
>Yes - that's a problem that I need to look at.
>
>>  When I change the value of the result from either 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 no notification is sent.
>>  Do I need to specify a notification line as well?
>
>No - if you don't specify an event explicitly, it will default to
>sending a notification.
>But you *do* need a "trapsink" (or similar) entry, so that the agent
>knows where to send it.
>
Got that line and it is to my network monitoring software system.
>
>>  Also, there is a -i between the -r 60 and the first -o entry.  Is this necessary?
>
>No - that's the (old) flag to indicate an "exact instance" entry.
>Hence specifying  extXxxx.1, extXxxx.2, etc

That is how my monitor line is set up right now.  One monitor per instance.
>
>Without this flag, the one monitor entry will be applied to all
>matching extResult instances
>(with corresponding extName and extOutput indexes).
>
Is this fixed for Solaris?  That is why it is there.  I can remove it and see what happens.

James McKenzie


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users